Oral Presentation Australian Society for Limnology Conference 2016

Vegetation outcomes: what are we seeking and why? (#26)

Cherie J Campbell 1 , Samantha Capon 2 , Cassandra James 3 , Kay Morris 4 , Jason Nicol 5 , Daryl Nielsen 6 , Rachael Thomas 7 8
  1. Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre, Mildura, VIC, Australia
  2. Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
  3. TropWater, James Cook University, Douglas Campus, QLD, Australia
  4. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
  5. Aquatic Sciences, SARDI, Henley Beach, SA, Australia
  6. CSIRO Land and Water Flagship, Wodonga, VIC, Australia
  7. NSW Office of Environment and Heritage, Sydney South, NSW, Australia
  8. Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Maintaining or improving vegetation condition or diversity are objectives of environmental water management common to wetlands across the Murray-Darling Basin. But what do we mean by an improved condition or diversity outcome and why do we care? The way we measure and assess condition and diversity outcomes is dependent on scale and the desired vegetation function. Here we conceptualise the need to consider vegetation responses across multiple scales of organisation (i.e. individual plants, populations, communities, landscapes/vegscapes) and multiple types of vegetation traits (e.g. compositional, structural and process). We also discuss the way in which interacting drivers may constrain the expression of vegetation traits. We provide examples of the way the conceptual framework may be applied to aid in the planning and assessment of vegetation outcomes at a range of scales and for a variety of functional outcomes.